The Emperor Wears No Clothes

"Be thankful that you have a life, and forsake your vain and presumptuous desire for a second one." (Richard Dawkins)

Phillip Garrido gives rambling interview to say that “A powerful and remarkable story will be told”

Have you figured it out yet? How could Phillip Garrido have explained the conception of two children to his wife without taking any of the blame for it and how will he be explaining their births to the world? Remember, it’s likely that his wife is suffering from the same religious-mania that obviously ails him.

The media are speculating that he wanted to be caught so that he can claim a conversion from “the dark side” but even this is so, I somehow doubt he’ll ever be given his freedom again.

I think there is a small chance that he may play his cards differently. Judging by what he is saying on his blog site I think it’s possible that he suckered his wife into believing that the two births were “immaculate”. If so, might he be planning to re-use this story for judge and jury?

As I typed that last sentence a news flash came on claiming that Mr. Garrido will plead “not guilty”. I could be on completely the wrong track (I often am) but I think the chances of a “virgin birth” claim just went up.

Filed under: News, Religion, ,

The Creator has given me the ability to speak in the tongue of angels in order to provide a wake-up call that will in time include the salvation of the entire world

Eighteen years after her abduction, the big news story today is the the finding of Jaycee Lee Dugard who was kidnapped in 1991 when she was 11 years old and who has been living ever since in the secluded back yard of a residential area on the outskirts of Sacramento, USA. Details of the story were just emerging as I was getting ready to retire to bed last night.

Commenting on the World Trade Centre attacks of 2001 Lorenzo Albacete said:

“From the first moment I looked into that horror on September 11th, into that fireball, into that explosion of horror, I knew it, I recognized an old companion. I recognized religion.”

As I lay down to go to sleep after watching the beginnings of the Jaycee Lee Dugard story I had a similar thought. I recognised religion.

Sure enough, this morning’s TV news reported that one of her abductors and probable father of her two children, Phillip Garrido, was questioned by police at the Berkeley University campus after having inquired about the procedure for handing out religious leaflets. The Telegraph website also reports that Mr. Garrido ran a blog called “Voices Revealed” and a quick Google search revealed the religious “method” behind his madness.

The author of the blog talks about “government mind control” and has links to another web address, godsdesire.net, which presently points to a web-host’s holding page. The blog seems to be the rantings of a madman and in the last post on the 14th of August the author writes:

“The Creator has given me the ability to speak in the tongue of angels in order to provide a wake-up call that will in time include the salvation of the entire world.”

It’s “early days” and I’m sure much more will come out.

See:
Jaycee Lee Dugard: kidnapped woman found alive 18 years after abduction” (Telegraph 28.08.09)
Voices Revealed Blogspot

Benjamin Pelham

Filed under: News, Religion, ,

Imam issues predictable and inevitable warning to author Sebastian Faulkes: “Don’t criticise Islam or else…”

placeholder

Sebastian Faulks: Koran has ‘no ethics’

A few posts back I commented on a report of author Sebastian Faulkes and  the “elephant in the room” that he was brave enough to point out after reading the Koran in order to research a new character for one of his books (click here to read the original post). Faulkes gave a very forthright and honest opinion saying:

“It’s a depressing book. It really is. It’s just the rantings of a schizophrenic. It’s very one-dimensional…With the Koran there are no stories. And it has no ethical dimension like the New Testament, no new plan for life. It says ‘the Jews and the Christians were along the right tracks, but actually, they were wrong and I’m right, and if you don’t believe me, tough — you’ll burn for ever’.”

Today we learn that a respected Muslim has issued what could be called a veiled warning and after all, how could anyone be surprised. Ajmal Masroor, an imam and spokesman for the Islamic Society of Britain said Faulks’ statements ran the risk of stirring religious hatred against Muslims. He said:

“Attacks on Islam are nothing new, but the danger is this will have a ‘drip, drip’ effect… People don’t seem to understand the consequences of saying things like this could be quite severe. History tells us it can encourage hatred.”

Firstly, both what Mr. Masroor says and the fact that he was asked for his opinion and quoted in the first place is pathetic. There are plenty of smarter and younger Muslims to ask who have a better understanding of what it is to live peacefully in the West. Why wasn’t Maajid Nawaz or anyone else at the Quilliam Foundation asked for their opinion? Why were none of the members of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain asked. Are cultural Muslims who happen to have left the actual faith of Islam unworthy of an opinion?

Sebastian Faulkes is an author who has the right, just like we all do, to give an honest opinion about a literary piece of work. To accuse him of “stirring religious hatred” simply because he gave his opinion is unfair.

Secondly, Ajmal Masroor is being foolish when he says that “people don’t understand the consequences” because the consequences are plainly there for all to see. We do understand is that any criticism of Islam or the Koran is liable to be met with violent thoughts, words and deeds. This is not our problem. It is an Islamic problem and therefore it is up to Islam to get its own house in order.

We have learned from history that what “encourages hatred” more than anything else is a dogmatic adherence to a hateful belief system. Islam hates freethinkers, atheists and homosexuals. It is a racist ideology that oppresses women and essentially looks down on all those who who disagree with its doctrine. Branches of it quite openly advocate killing these people who it sees as “enemies”.

We are very “respectful” of Islam already and most of the time we, who hold western values, keep our mouths shut even when criticism is warranted. Sebastian Faulkes is a mild-mannered and humble author who has had the temerity to criticise Islam. His view is based on his own values and Ajmal Masroor’s attempt to redefine his values as prejudices must not be allowed to succeed. When Mr. Masroor says that Foulkes’ words “encourage hatred” he is wrong. It is Mr. Masroor who is doing all the encouraging and the hatred is coming from within Islam rather than being directed towards it.

“Words are being used quite shamelessly to try and engineer an artificial sense of guilt in western society, to redefine our values as prejudices and to silence legitimate opinion and the free exchange of ideas that have made us what we are and that have given us our strength and that’s why this is damaging our society in a fundamental way and it has got to stop.”

“All over the western world we’ve become so intimidated into watching every word and thought in case it might offend somebody’s precious faith. It’s as if the free world has forgotten to inhale. What happened to our birthright? We need to take a deep breath. We need to get the oxygen of freedom flowing through our veins again and through our brains again and get things back in perspective.” (Pat Condell)

Nice try Ajmal, and who could blame you for trying? You are simply using the same tactics that most of Islam has used against its perceived “enemies” for countless generations; fear and intimidation. It just won’t wash. Even the apologist “new liberal left” is starting to realise the folly of giving in to people like you for the sake of appeasement. Our culture is founded upon freedom rather than submission and we will stand up to any twisted values that are based on blind faith alone. We will attempt to do this with the pen rather than the sword because reason is the most powerful weapon of all and however many senseless killings there are we have empirical evidence that the path of violence and fanaticism ultimately leads to failure.

Issuing warnings, threats and fatwas against authors for airing their opinions, amongst a majority who expect that of them, is a misguided way to deal with what is essentially in internal Islamic problem. The West has come a long way towards attempting to accommodate Islam. We are inclusive by nature. We are ready to accept people for what they are but we are not ready to compromise our hard-won freedom to do that.

See:
Is it really “courting controversy” to say that there is an elephant in the room?” (TEWNC 24.08.09)
Sebastian Faulks: Koran has ‘no ethics’” (The Times 23.08.09)
Author Sebastian Faulks risks Muslim fury by describing the Koran as the ‘depressing rantings of a schizophrenic’” (Mail Online 24.08.09)
The Quilliam Foundation
Apologists for Evil” (by Pat Condell – Video & Transcript)
Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain

Benjamin Pelham

Filed under: Appeasement for Islam, books, Homosexuality, Islam, News, Religion, The Koran, , , , ,

Why are prisoners who don’t even have the right to vote given so many privileges when it comes to faith?

The Advantages of Faith

Belief is its own reward

At the moment convicted British prisoners can’t vote  although a change in the law is under consideration for those whose sentence is less than four years. Why is a real and tangible process such as voting denied to them when something as frivolous as faith is permitted?

It seems that all religions, even the weirdest ones, are well respected in British prisons and prisoners of even minority faiths are furbished with all sorts of accessories and privileges so that they can “worship”.

Pagans can have a hood-less robe, a flexible twig for a wand, incense, jewellery and rune stones. They are also allowed to have Tarot cards as long as a “risk assessment” is made by the prison authorities and no prisoner uses their Tarot cards for fortune-telling with other prisoners. In addition to being allowed to have all this stuff, pagans can choose two holidays per year, from a list, when they are excused from work. This list of days includes Samhain, as Hallowe’en is know in paganism, the vernal equinox and the midsummer solstice.

According to figures published this month the population breakdown of faiths in British prisons is as follows:

26,000 Atheist
23,000 Anglican
14,000 Roman Catholic
9,795 Muslim
366 Pagan
340 Rastafarian
6 Nation of Islam

Ignoring the fact that Judaism seems to have been left out of the figures all together it is interesting to note that the majority of prisoners are atheists. Does this mean that there is a greater tendency towards criminality among atheists? I hope not.

I don’t know whether I am in favour of prisoners being given voting rights as it is not something I’ve really ever thought about enough to have formulated an opinion. I am very surprised however that our society affords even prisoners so much respect for their belief in the supernatural.

See:
Privileges ease spell in prison for pagans
(The Times 01.08.09)

B.P.

Filed under: Atheism, Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Paganism, Religion, Special Religious Dispensation, ,

Afghan rape laws for the “modern” world… A husband’s right to have sex a minimum number of times per week has been abolished but now he can legally starve his wife for refusing his sexual demands

Hamid Karzei

Progressive President Hamid Karzei

With Afghanistan in the midst of election fever its “enlightened” and relatively fresh young president, Hamid Karza, has apparently just signed an amended version of the marital rape laws.

The clause that insists that men have the right to sex with their wives a certain number of times a week has been withdrawn and men will only have the right to deny their wives food for withholding sexual favours.

Courts will also be able to grant guardianship of women’s children to fathers and grandfathers should wives be lacking in the lust department.

In addition the “marital rape laws” will grant men who are guilty of the “petty” crime of rape the chance to get away with their crimes so long as they can pay to avoid prosecution.

Reporting in The Times newspaper today Melanie Reid writes:

“[It] would be funny if it weren’t so tragic. The British Army, decent and professional and upstanding as ever, now finds itself fighting to within an inch of the polling stations in order to allow Afghan men to continue mildly unpleasant habits such as withholding food from their wives, insisting on sex and imprisoning them in their own home. (Which makes you wonder exactly what the problem with the Taleban was.)”

See:
Right to rape: is that what we’re fighting for?
(The Times 18.08.09)

B.P.

Filed under: Afghanistan, Islam, Religion, Stupidity, , ,

Flying rabbis attempt to save Israelis from swine flu by getting the horn

Up,up and away with Swine Flu

Up,up and away with Swine Flu

When I fist read the BBC News headline I had to rub my eyes then I was glad I had rubbed them because I had got it wrong after all. It was not “Flying Rabbits Fight Swine Flu” but rather “Flying Rabbis Fight Swine Flu”. Phew! Now flying rabbits are one thing but flying rabbis are a totally different kettle of fish.

It seems that a whole bunch of rabbis actually boarded a plane and flew over Israel performing a ritual in an effort to protect Israelis against swine flu. How much more normal could it be. The BBC article reports that they were accompanied by Jewish mystics and for a brief moment I wondered what they might be. Then it dawned on me. They are obviously people who are even more experienced in the silly-hats-department than most orthodox Jews, who mutter incantations and spout so much bullshit that even the most devout are taken in by them.

According to Rabbi Yitzhak Batzri their group got into a metal container with wings and presumably a few engines and then blew a horn while they were over Israel to “stop the pandemic so people will stop dying from it”. (Most Israelis don’t refer to the virus “Swine Flu”. Disliking pigs they prefer to call it “H1N1” which is ironic because that is the preferred term used by the World Health Authority WHO (boom, boom) failed miserably in persuading most of the world to actually use it.)

Well now I’ve seen everything.

See:
Flying rabbis fight swine flu
BBC (12.08.09)

B.P.

Filed under: Israel, Judaism, News, Religion, Stupidity, ,

Speedos, “birkinis” and the strange mixed up world of modern bathing apparel

Bathing costume styles are high on the agenda in this week’s “silly season” news stories.

It seems that some men like to wear shorts whilst others swear by skimpy Speedos and women can choose between a one-piece suit or a bikini ensemble. A few (as reported in my last post) like to let it all hang out by wearing nothing at all. But now there is a new way to bathe. Yes, this week saw the addition of the “burkini” to our repertoire of swimming apparel.

The "Birkini" (and friend)

Purple Track Suit with Blue Scarf

This week saw Carole, a 35-year-old Muslim woman banned from wearing a “birkini” in a small provincial French Parisian suburb by the chief lifeguard of a swimming pool. He is reported to have banned her on the grounds of hygiene.

Described as “a head-to-toe swimsuit to aid Muslim women in their quest for modesty”, the “birkini” completely covers a woman’s body except for the face.

I lived in France for a year and in Germany for much longer. Such are the swimming pool by-laws. It is just a fact. Men are not permitted to wear heavy shorts but must wear lightweight briefs because an abundance of absorbent natural cotton-type material is said to be able to harbour more bacteria than thinner man-made fibre. I’m not sure just how much scientific evidence there is for this and I suspect that wearing one thing or another wouldn’t really make much difference; swimming pools are chlorine saturated environments anyway but that’s not the point is it. Rules are rules and exceptions and special dispensations should not be made only for one particular section of the community; especially not for the one section that seems to believe that is is always a “special case”.

A Naughty "Package"

A Naughty "Package"

In another bathing-costume-related story this week we read about a ban on Speedos at Alton Towers on the grounds that men’s “packages” were too shocking for children to see although many believe that the story probably originated from Alton Towers’ management in a publicity-seeking attempt during a summer that was promised to be a scorcher but instead turned out to be a very damp squib.

In the case of the banned Muslim woman in France, thankfully sanity prevailed and her complaint to the local police on the grounds of discrimination was met with scorn. Carole, who was born into a traditional French family became a convert to Islam when she was seventeen. She bought her “birkini” whilst on holiday in Dubai. The French police told her that she was in contravention of the hygiene laws and she was warned not to be such a silly girl and then sent on her way. I suspect that her subsequent threats to “leave France” have been met with roars of approval.

At any rate, Carole and others of a similar mind are welcome at beaches all along the French coast where their additional bacteria can do no harm in the already heavily polluted salty water. As for Speedo-wearing men with large “packages”… well they should surely have better things to do than visiting tacky amusement parks.

See:
French Muslim woman wearing ‘burkini’ banned from Paris swimming pool
(Times Online 13.08.09)

Alton Towers bans men in Speedos
(Guardian 10.08.09)

B.P.

Filed under: Islam, News, Religion, , , ,

Is there really cause for concern over the growth of Islam in Europe?

Whenever harsh Islamic laws in Muslim countries come into question it seems that British Muslims are quick to defend those laws by pointing out that above all, Islam preaches that Muslims must have respect for the laws of the country in which they live. If pushed, British Muslim leaders admit that true Islamic law calls for the death penalty for those who leave Islam and convert to other religions or for those who become atheists (AKA apostasy).

On the weekend two different articles published in the Telegraph newspaper predict that a fifth of the European Union will be Muslim by the year 2050 and if this figure is accurate then what changes to our laws might we very well expect to see as a result?

Many will point out that if even if the forecast of 20% is accurate, Christians will still remain the sizeable majority but while this may very well be true, what is sometimes forgotten is that all religions are not equal. Christianity, for all its past and present evils, is a relatively benign force when compared to Islam. In addition a child growing up within the Christian faith is sooner or later free to decide whether to stay or to leave the church. The same can not be said for Muslims.

In recent history American fundamentalist Christians were responsible for several very violent anti-abortionist attacks and another, Timothy McVeigh, blew up a building full of innocent people. There have been a few other examples of this sort of extremist behaviour but the violence by Christian fundamentalists has hardly been on a par with attacks by Muslims on the rest of Christendom or even with attacks by Muslims on other Muslims.

Of course many British Muslims would disagree. They would no doubt argue that our armed forces have been marching all over Muslim countries killing people just like the Crusaders did in the eleventh and twelfth centuries but surely this is unfair as Christianity was not the driving force behind their actions. The reasons for their presence have little to do with any Christian versus Muslim mentality. They are there to attempt to promote stability for the majority of the indigenous people of those countries. Indeed some of our soldiers are themselves Muslim and wherever possible their agenda has been largely one of training police and armed forces so that those countries will eventually become responsible for their own stability.

I am an atheist who is moving more towards anti theism with each fresh atrocity that I see perpetrated in the righteous name of religion. My ideal world would be one without any gods; one in which a child born in Dublin would be labelled neither Catholic nor Protestant but would just be seen as a child. We would never call a child whose parents were bird-watchers an “ornithologist child” so why with religion do we label a child from birth and thus make it someone’s enemy before it has even learned to walk?

I think that there is a cause for concern over the growth of Islam in Europe. However much we would like to pretend that all religions are equal, they plainly are not. Islam has been so slow and unwilling to adapt thus far. Its core beliefs are rooted in dogmatism of the purest immovable order and its most central belief, that the Koran is the literal word of God, makes it unlikely to change. The majority of its followers are taught that the rest of the world will adapt in order to accommodate and incorporate Islamic belief rather than the other way around. What hope can there be when faith explicitly forbids compromise?

See:
A fifth of European Union will be Muslim by 2050
(Telegraph 08.08.09)
and
Muslim Europe: the demographic time bomb transforming our continent
(Telegraph 08.08.09)

B.P.

Filed under: Islam, Religion, ,

Atheists are more organised than ever before but is atheism a religion?

Recently several people with whom I’ve been talking have claimed that Atheism is a religion and this is something that really irks me. Atheism most certainly is not a religion.

Religions share qualities that play no part in Atheism. What I suspect people are thinking of when they make this error is the organisational quality of modern atheism and the fact that atheists are increasingly joining various groups or “camps”.

The main characteristics of religion are:

  • A belief in supernatural beings.
  • Objects, places and even times viewed as “sacred”.
  • Ritual acts focused on happenings, objects, places and times.
  • Moral codes that have supernatural origins.
  • Prayer and/or communication with supernatural beings.
  • Social groups based on shared belief systems.

Atheism has none of these characteristics apart from perhaps the last one to a very small extent and only as a relatively recent development.

My parents were church goers and I got dragged along to Sunday School and Church in the 1970s. I hated it with a passion, mostly because I knew I had something better to do, like watch the end of “Thunderbirds” or “The Banana Splits”.

We were members of a High Anglican church but I never had the feeling that our church was any more than a social occasion for my mother to get dressed up and show off her newest hat. After church we would all get ten pence worth of sweeties at “Bobbies”, a nearby newsagent that opened on Sunday morning. We would meet other kids at Sunday School and play conkers or swap marbles with them.

Church attendance was certainly higher then than it is now but most church goers didn’t seem to be taking religion that seriously. It was a duty and the hour or so spent listening to a crusty old fool banging on about Sodom and Gomorrah was rewarded with some good nosh after the service and a pint or two at the local for the adults while the children played in pub gardens. It was all very pleasant and civilized.

Religion in the 1970s was dying. Anthony Trollope once said “The Church of England is the only church in the world that interferes neither with your politics nor your religion” and never was this more so. As an elder of my teenage fold I firmly believed that by the time I was my father’s age, religion would have become virtually extinct. In my twenties nothing remarkable happened to change this view. Religion was a joke and almost everybody knew it. But then came the twenty-first century and all that changed in the blink of an eye.

In 1997 Britain had a new government and its leader, Tony Blair, was a Christian. Most thought he was a normal passive modern-day Christian. It took 19 angry young Muslims to change that perception and then we saw him for what he was; a crusading, sword-wielding self-righteous man.

9/11 changed everything in one fell swoop and we are still living with the consequences of that change today. Orwell’s nightmare vision of nineteen-eighty-four was real after all and Mr. Blair (of the Orwell variety) was just out by a decade or two. New Labour used the Magna Carta as toilet paper and introduced the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act. Councils spied on people, CCTV became widespread and it was all done in the name of “security”.

Religion naturally reared its ugly head again and just as we thought it was all over the madness had a rerun to top all reruns. Fundamentalist religious types all started seeping out of the woodwork to add their tuppence worth to the “debate”. They used the new media to spread their message and suddenly it seemed like we were all surrounded by crazy lunatic fanatics. It was worse than that. Their views were being taken seriously by the mainstream.

Atheists until then were, for the most part, content smug people who thought “let these fools believe what they want, it can’t do much harm” but after 9/11 and then 7/7 nobody was thinking that any more. Religion was all very well when its main raison d’etre was showing of a new hat to the congregation on a Sunday but when planes were flown into buildings and 2974 innocent people were murdered live on the world’s television screens atheists, like the rest of the world, made a fundamental shift.

Richard Dawkins had written six books before the Twentieth Century ended, starting with “The Selfish Gene” published as far back as 1976. He made his mark and had a small following but not many knew of him until this century when he made several documentaries and then, in 2006 published, what is perhaps regarded as his most contentious work, “The God Delusion”. With this book he pulled no punches. Just the title was enough to make every vicar in the land drop his choirboy and choke on the Host at the Holy Communion.

Suddenly atheists were getting organised. Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris and many other atheist intellectuals enjoyed a following like never before. There were lectures at Berkeley, there was “The Brights” movement and in 2006, the same year that Dawkins published “The God Delusion”, Bobby Henderson published “The Gospel of The Flying Spaghetti Monster”. On the Net there were atheist chat-rooms, forums and websites.  Atheists were coming in from the cold.

Atheist groups are still a loose collection of small collectives but the concept as an organised movement is quickly gaining momentum. Last Thursday The Times newspaper reported on Britain’s first atheist summer camp for children set up by Edwin Kagin, a 68-year-old American lawyer who set up his “Camp Quest” organisation in 1996 after hearing of a Scout turned away from camp because he admitted to being an atheist.

I suspect that it will be some time before atheists have a world organisation of their own. For one thing, it is not in an atheist’s nature to be a joiner. Until very recently atheists saw no need to profess a belief. It was their lack of belief and therefore their lack of willingness or organise as atheists that defined them.

Today, surrounded with religious argument and in an increasingly politically correct society where there is so much intolerance towards any kind of religious criticism, many atheists are starting to realise that silence just isn’t enough. They are quite rightly asking “Have we been too tolerant of religion?” and “Is it time to start kicking religion up the arse?” Atheists are now crying out for a focal point, an organisation; dare I say it, a church around which to congregate. Books by atheist intellectuals and Flying Spaghetti Monsters are all very well but are they really the the glue that will help to create a sane future without gods?

Atheism is not a religion but if atheists are to evolve and win the battle for hearts and minds then maybe it is time it became one. Maybe atheists need to get more vocal, get more militant and above all, get more organised.

B.P.

Filed under: Atheism, Religion, , , , , , , ,

Death by Belief – The Madeline Neumann Story

When 11-yr-old Madeline Neumann exhibited all the symptoms of diabetes her father wasn’t worried because he knew that God would protect her. When Madeline became so ill that she could not eat, drink or walk you’d have thought that her father might have called a doctor but he didn’t. Instead he summoned friends and relatives to her bedside at their home in the American Midwest and they all prayed as they watched her life slowly ebbing away.

Madeline’s father was recently convicted of her death but testifying in court he said that he had believed that God would cure her and that he never expected her to die.
He said:

“God promises in the Bible to heal. If I go to the doctor, I am putting the doctor before God…We figured there was something really fighting in her body. We asked people to join with us in prayer. I didn’t believe at all that the Lord would ever allow her to pass.”

He also said that he believed that “sickness is a result of sin” but that his daughter’s death had not shaken his faith.

Neumann’s defence lawyer claimed that he had not committed a criminal act because he truly believed that Madeline would be saved by prayer. Luckily the judge did not agree and neither did the jury which returned a guilty verdict after fifteen hours of deliberation.

So let’s see what we have here; an ancient book which supposedly contains God’s promise to heal, a God who apparently doesn’t keep his promises and a man with an Abraham-complex who has since stated that he will follow the instructions given in the book for the foreseeable future even though he was apparently lied to and who believes that his own daughter’s sickness, a treatable medical condition, was the result of sin, an intangible notion of morality that can be shown to be completely subjective. Mr. Neumann also seems to be blaming one of his three invisible imaginary friends, “The Lord”, for her death when he says he “didn’t believe..that The Lord would allow her to pass”. Have I left anything out? Oh yes, a poor little girl who was denied the chance to have a full and productive life by those whom she trusted most.

B.P.

Filed under: Christianity, Death by Belief, Religion, ,

Welcome…

"The philosophies of one age become the absurdities of the next and the
foolishness of yesterday becomes the wisdom of tomorrow."
Sir William Osler

Your Comments

Comments are always welcome and any that have been left can be immediately read by clicking on the blue comment number above the title of the post. To comment just click on the comment number or title of the post to open it in a page of its own and go to the comment input box. No name or email need necessarily be left to make a comment but all comments are fully moderated (for deliberate abuse only) and so it may be a short time until they appear. Please be patient. Thank you.

“Atheism” – A term that should not exist

"Atheism is a term that should not even exist. No one ever needs to identify himself as a "non-astrologer" or a "non-alchemist." We do not have words for people who doubt that Elvis is still alive or that aliens have traversed the galaxy only to molest ranchers and their cattle. Atheism is nothing more than the noises reasonable people make in the presence of unjustified religious beliefs."
Sam Harris

For more Harris quotes Click Here

“There Almost Certainly Is No God” says Mr Dawkins

"...most of the traditional arguments for God's existence, from Aquinas on, are easily demolished. Several of them, such as the First Cause argument, work by setting up an infinite regress which God is wheeled out to terminate. But we are never told why God is magically able to terminate regresses while needing no explanation himself. To be sure, we do need some kind of explanation for the origin of all things. Physicists and cosmologists are hard at work on the problem. But whatever the answer - a random quantum fluctuation or a Hawking/Penrose singularity or whatever we end up calling it - it will be simple. Complex, statistically improbable things, by definition, don't just happen; they demand an explanation in their own right. They are impotent to terminate regresses, in a way that simple things are not. The first cause cannot have been an intelligence - let alone an intelligence that answers prayers and enjoys being worshipped. Intelligent, creative, complex, statistically improbable things come late into the universe, as the product of evolution or some other process of gradual escalation from simple beginnings. They come late into the universe and therefore cannot be responsible for designing it."
Richard Dawkins

For full text Click Here

Hitchins says “Islam. Don’t ram it down my throat”

"Islam makes very large claims for itself. In its art, there is a prejudice against representing the human form at all. The prohibition on picturing the prophet – who was only another male mammal – is apparently absolute. So is the prohibition on pork or alcohol or, in some Muslim societies, music or dancing. Very well then, let a good Muslim abstain rigorously from all these. But if he claims the right to make me abstain as well, he offers the clearest possible warning and proof of an aggressive intent."
Christopher Hitchins

For full text Click Here

Magician James Randi says “Magic does not work”

"Science is best defined as a careful, disciplined, logical search for knowledge about any and all aspects of the universe, obtained by examination of the best available evidence and always subject to correction and improvement upon discovery of better evidence. What's left is magic. And it doesn't work."
James Randi

For more Randi quotes Click Here

Hitchens declares himself to be an “antitheist”

"I am not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions are versions of the same untruth, but I hold that the influence of churches, and the effect of religious belief is positively harmful. Reviewing the false claims of religion, I do not wish, as some sentimental materialists affect to wish, that they were true. I do not envy believers their faith. I am relieved to think that the whole story is a sinister fairy tale; life would be miserable if what the faithful affirmed was actually the case."
Christopher Hitchens

For more Hitchens quotes Click Here

Atheist Quotes

"The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully."
Richard Dawkins


"When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion."
Robert Pirsig


"We must question the logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes."
Gene Roddenberry


"I do not fear death. I had been dead for billions and billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the slightest inconvenience from it."
Mark Twain


"Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned."
Unknown


"I have never seen the slightest scientific proof of the religious ideas of heaven and hell, of future life for individuals, or of a personal God. So far as religion of the day is concerned, it is a damned fake. Religion is all bunk."
Thomas Edison


"I'm afraid that I am severly dissapointed in God's works. All three of him have shown no tendency to improve and He merely sits at the back of the class talking to himselves. He has shown no interest in rugger, asked to be excused prayers, and moves in a mysterious way."
Monty Python (God's School Report)


"People will then often say, ‘But surely it’s better to remain an Agnostic just in case?’ This, to me, suggests such a level of silliness and muddle that I usually edge out of the conversation rather than get sucked into it. If it turns out that I’ve been wrong all along, and there is in fact a god, and if it further turned out that this kind of legalistic, 'cross your fingers behind your back', Clintonian hair-splitting impressed him, then I think I would choose not to worship him anyway."
Douglas Adams


"With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion."
Steven Weinberg


"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."
Stephen Roberts


"After my Christmas Lectures I received letters from the pious saying that they would have no objection if only I had qualified my remarks by saying: 'But I should warn you that many well-informed people think differently'. When did you last hear a priest-in the pulpit, on radio, on television or in Sunday School qualify his statement with 'But I should warn you that many well-informed people don't think God exists at all?'"
Richard Dawkins


"Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day; teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime; give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish."
Unknown


"From the first moment I looked into that horror on September 11th, into that fireball, into that explosion of horror, I knew it, I recognized an old companion. I recognized religion."
Lorenzo Albacete


"If there were a God, I think it very unlikely that He would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence."
Bertrand Russell


"Isn’t it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?"
Douglas Adams


If…

"If you can keep your head when all about you Are losing theirs and blaming it on you, If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you, But make allowance for their doubting too; If you can wait and not be tired by waiting, Or being lied about, don't deal in lies, Or being hated, don't give way to hating, And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:


If you can dream - and not make dreams your master; If you can think - and not make thoughts your aim; If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster And treat those two impostors just the same; If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools, Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken, And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools


If you can make one heap of all your winnings And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss, And lose, and start again at your beginnings And never breathe a word about your loss; If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew To serve your turn long after they are gone, And so hold on when there is nothing in you Except the Will which says to them: 'Hold on!'


If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue, ' Or walk with Kings - nor lose the common touch, if neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you, If all men count with you, but none too much; If you can fill the unforgiving minute With sixty seconds' worth of distance run, Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it, And - which is more - you'll be a Man, my son!"

Rudyard Kipling

Five Thousand Dead Gods

No god I know is still alive
all five thousand and seven
appear to have died.

The great god Huitzilopochtli
led the Aztecs' divine pack -
but He departed awhile back.

Zeus was fun, and had His run,
but while disguised as a swan,
they say, His neck got wrung.

Pluto - God of the Underworld,
offended the ladies of Hades,
and got buried in his own Hell.

Thor, I'm told, was big and bold,
but going out without a cloak,
they say, He died of the cold.

And ghosts of dead Indian gods
can't even haunt a decent tepee,
and many die on late night T.V.

No prisoners tremble on the altar
when their beating hearts are torn
to join Tezcatlipoca in the sky.

And no children scream as they
are loaded onto the simple machine
that feeds them to Moloch's fire.

And for ancient Greece's Dionysus,
no drums sound, no flute plays -
but, oh, weren't those the days!

The goddesses, too, we must include,
for all were dear to some, and lived
in our hearts until the time had come.

There was Athena , Gaia, and Kore,
Xochiquetzal, Minerva, and Astarte,
Ixtab, Kuan Yin, and Kali of course.

Five thousand gods and goddesses -
maybe ten or a hundred fifty thousand
or more, there might have been.

But the goddesses and gods have all
gone, one by one, until there are none
but those that are still willed alive.

- Gods and goddesses kept alive
by people still believing - still
trusting - in their own creations.

Pinocchio becomes god of the wood,
while Pygmalion falls on his knees
before his goddess of stone, Galatea.

We remember the Loving Mother
and the Father the All-Mighty
looming large in an infant's eyes.

For each girl-woman makes the God
she craves and needs - then kneels
before Him and says, "Oh, please!"

And each boy-man makes himself
a Goddess that he wishes,
giving a Mother's hugs and kisses.

And older men and women tend
to make our gods with
wrinkled brow and constant pout.

Still we always make our gods
to look a lot like me and you -
one head, one mouth, two eyes.

But the god of songbirds flies,
and the gods of all the fishes
must swim through ocean skies.

The god of cattle may be a bull,
or just maybe it's a cow -
I can't hope to settle that now.

But I am well informed by
one who ought to know:
the god of dogs is a bitch!

God laughs? Not on your life!
The joke's on us - but I'm told
She's heard this joke before!

glennlogan

The Brights

TED

The James Randi Educational Foundation

RichardDawkins.net

The Skeptic's Guide

Videos

Michael Shermer on strange beliefs
"Why do people see the Virgin Mary on a cheese sandwich or hear demonic lyrics in "Stairway to Heaven"? Using video and music, skeptic Michael Shermer shows how we convince ourselves to believe - and overlook the facts."
Michael Shermer at TED

Click Here to watch

Elaine Morgan says we evolved from aquatic apes
"Elaine Morgan is a tenacious proponent of the aquatic ape hypothesis: the idea that humans evolved from primate ancestors who dwelt in watery habitats. Hear her spirited defense of the idea -- and her theory on why mainstream science doesn't take it seriously."
Elaine Morgan at TED

Click Here to watch

Pat Condell - Apologists for Evil
"The comedian Pat Condell has made over 50 videos that are hosted at YouTube. This one, "Apologists for Evil" is one of his best to date and deals with 'The cultural treachery of the liberal left.' Mr. Condell's plain speaking doesn't pull any punches. He tells it how it is and I've yet to find a single thing I can disagree with in any of his videos."
Pat Condell

Click Here to watch (with full transcript)
The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

Atheist News at The Guardian

Atheist News at The Atheist Spot

British Humanish Association

Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain

Humanist Society of Scotland

National Secular Society

New Humanist Magazine

BBC Religion & Ethics - Atheism

Pat Condell's YouTube Channel

Blogcatalog - Social Blogger Community & Blog Directory

Blogarama - The Blog Directory

Atheist Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Baloney Deyection Kit by Michael Shermer

RSS Christopher Hitchens Blog

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Sam Harris Blog

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS James Randi Educational Foundation

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS The Atheist Spot

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Disclaimer

Websites linked to from this weblog have no affiliation to it unless specifically stated and all views and opinions expressed in posts and comments are those of the respective authors. Posts may be reproduced in whole or in part as long as credit to the original author is provided.